Support SparkForge

No ads, no sponsors, no affiliate deals. Readers are the only funding source, which is the correct arrangement for a publication about surveillance. Here is what each tier pays for.

Why this work costs money to produce

Privacy and surveillance writing goes stale faster than almost any other technical subject. Settings menus move. Vendors reverse course. Guidance that was correct in 2022 becomes actively misleading by 2026.

A concrete example from this site. The Android ad tracking guide used to say the advertising ID was being retired and that apps would mint their own identifiers to replace it. That was a fair reading of Google's Privacy Sandbox announcement at the time. Then in October 2025 Google withdrew most of Privacy Sandbox, including Topics and the Attribution Reporting API on Android. The advertising ID is not going away after all, the settings have moved twice, and Play policy now forbids the substitution the old guide predicted. Correcting one short post meant reading three primary sources and rewriting it from scratch.

That is the actual job. Not producing more words, but keeping existing words true. Every guide here states what it changes, what it does not fix, and where it has aged. Doing that honestly takes research hours that nobody sees.

What membership funds.

SparkForge takes no advertising, sponsorships, or affiliate arrangements that shape recommendations. SparkForge takes no advertising, no sponsorships, and no affiliate arrangements that shape what gets recommended. That leaves readers as the only funding source, which is the correct arrangement for a publication about surveillance.

Free:

Costs nothing and still matters. A free account gets new articles by email and access to the members-only material. More usefully, it shows which subjects people actually come here for, which determines what gets written next. If money is tight, this is a completely legitimate way to support the work.

SparkForge, $5 a month or $50 a year:

Funds the research layer. Reading primary sources rather than repeating other people's summaries, verifying claims against statute and vendor documentation, and going back to correct guides that have aged. This tier keeps the archive from rotting.

Gold: $10 a month or $100 a year.

Funds how-to guide development and prioritizes which guides get built. The site has 33 practical walkthroughs. Each one requires testing the steps on a real device, on a current OS version, and documenting where the instructions diverge by manufacturer. That testing is slow, and it's why the guides can honestly say when they no longer apply.

Elite: $100 a month or $1,000 a year.

Funds the long-form work that takes weeks rather than days, and includes 12 hours of direct consultation to build a privacy protection plan for your specific situation. This tier exists for people whose exposure is not hypothetical and who need the analysis applied to their own circumstances rather than described in general.

What your money does not buy:

It does not buy influence over what gets said. No tier changes a recommendation, and nothing on this site is ranked by who paid. If a tool is bad, it will say so regardless of who sells it.

It also does not buy exclusivity over the material that matters most. The threat model work, the surveillance industry research, and the majority of the practical guidance stay free, because a privacy publication that locks its safety guidance behind a paywall has misunderstood its own subject.

What has been built so far:

  • 95 published articles, approximately 93,000 words
  • 33 step-by-step how-to guides, organized by platform
  • Case study research on real operations where tradecraft failed, including the Skripal poisoning and the Golden State Killer investigation
  • An ongoing catalog of the surveillance industry, drawn from primary sources
  • Four subject hubs indexing every article on the site

If any of that has been useful, membership keeps it going and current.